The recent proclamation that Michigan is a “No-Kill State” by Michigan Pet Fund Alliance has bothered many people in the animal rescue community. These animal advocates, who work or volunteer at animal shelters and rescue organizations, feel that the general public will not understand how the phrase “no kill” is defined in animal welfare circles. Generally speaking, the animal welfare community has decided that no kill means that 90% or more of “adoptable” animals are saved. This idea has been accepted by groups such as Maddie’s Fund, Best Friend’s Animal Society and many others. The headlines across Michigan should have been about the 90% save rate and not the “no kill” title.
An important thing to know about save rates is that every shelter has its own definition of what “adoptable” means. The criteria is usually whether an animal is too sick, injured or aggressive to be adopted out but, even those decisions are subjective on a shelter-to-shelter basis.The animal welfare community usually calls the 90% number a “save rate” instead of concentrating on actual euthanasia numbers. Pet Friends Magazine has always counted euthanasia numbers when going through the shelter reports from the Michigan Dept. of Agriculture. There are problems using save rate numbers in Michigan when there are issues like transfers from shelters to rescues being recorded as adoptions in the shelter reports. This is what the Dept. of Agriculture asks the shelters to do. By doing a save rate like Pet Fund Alliance, they have no idea how many adoptions were really transfers to rescue groups. If the pet is adopted by a rescue group who is a Michigan registered organization, one pet will show up in the shelter reports as being adopted twice.
Pet Friends Magazine decided to take a deep dive into the numbers reported by the Michigan Department of Agriculture. The registered shelters provide this information to them every year. My reporting about these numbers is as honest to you as possible, using common sense on which pets the shelter is really responsible for, either by finding adopters or deciding on euthanasia. Continue reading